Research Product · Interactive · Updated · Quarterly

The GCC AI Regulatory Tracker

Six states, four regimes, one map. Click a country for its data protection, transfer, AI governance and free-zone position, every entry sourced to primary law. Below: who is ready, how binding each rulebook really is, and the decade that built them.

1 · The Map
Saudi ArabiaOmanUnited Arab EmiratesQatarKuwaitBahrainSAUDIOMANUAEQATARKUWAITBAHRAINThe GulfArabian Sea
2 · Who Is Ready

Government AI readiness, scored.

Scores from the Oxford Insights Government AI Readiness Index 2025 (corrected January 2026 dataset), 0 to 100 across 195 countries. Grey bars are non-GCC benchmarks. Saudi Arabia leads the region at 15th in the world; the gap to the frontier is real but closing.

3 · Under the Bonnet

Six pillars. Very different stories.

The same index, decomposed. The Gulf scores like the frontier on policy vision and government adoption, and like the emerging world on development depth and resilience. Hover any cell for the exact score; click a state to load it on the map. Benchmarks in the lower rows.

85 and above 70 to 84 55 to 69 40 to 54 Below 40
4 · The Gulf Paradox

People ready. Compute scarce.

Two sub-dimensions from the same index tell the region’s whole story: Gulf human capital already sits near benchmark level, while measured compute capacity remains a fraction of the frontier’s. It is exactly the gap the $100bn-scale build-outs on this page are racing to close.

Compute capacity

Oxford Insights 2025 sub-dimension, 0 to 100

Human capital

Oxford Insights 2025 sub-dimension, 0 to 100
5 · The Build-Out

The pipeline is not where the press releases are.

Tracked data centre pipeline in megawatts (eninrac GCC outlook, July 2026; comparable across the four states it tracks). Saudi Arabia’s tracked pipeline alone exceeds the region’s entire live capacity today. Kuwait and Oman publish no pipeline figures, which is itself worth knowing. The announced mega-projects below sit largely on top of these tracked pipelines, not inside them.

Saudi1,963
UAE850
Qatar112.9
Bahrain49.7
KuwaitNo published pipeline figuren/a
OmanNo published pipeline figuren/a

Tracked pipeline, MW · Source: eninrac, 8 July 2026 · Live IT load where published: Saudi Arabia 410 MW, UAE 507.7 MW (Mordor Intelligence, 2025); Qatar 26 MW operator floor (Syntys, January 2026)

5 GW
UAE-US AI Campus, Abu Dhabi: includes the 1 GW Stargate UAE cluster, first 200 MW expected live in 2026
1.5 GW
DataVolt NEOM Oxagon campus, Saudi Arabia: first 300 MW phase due 2028
500 MW
HUMAIN x NVIDIA AI factories, Saudi Arabia: up to 500 MW over five years
6 · How Binding Is the Rulebook

Law, regulation, or press release?

Institute assessment of each regime's legal force as of August 2026. Hover any cell for the basis; the full sourced matrix is below. The pattern worth noticing: every state now has enforceable data protection rules, and not one has a binding general AI law.

In force: binding and operating Partial: binding but incomplete, sectoral or dormant Soft law: strategy, guidance or draft only None
Enforcement Watch

A law is only as real as its enforcement. The scoreboard so far: active in Riyadh and the DIFC, quiet almost everywhere else.

Saudi Arabia48 violation decisions over the past year (announced February 2026)Source →
United Arab EmiratesFederal: no enforcement yet; DIFC: 273 fine decision notices in 2025; ADGM: 2 published actionsSource →
QatarAt least 3 published binding decisions (Oct 2024 to Apr 2025), no fine amounts disclosedSource →
BahrainNo public enforcement decisions yetSource →
KuwaitNo public enforcement yetSource →
OmanNo public enforcement yet; law only fully enforceable since 5 February 2026Source →
7 · The Regulatory Decade

2016 to 2026: from first data law to AI-native government.

8 · The World Context

Where the Gulf sits in the global rulebook.

European UnionBinding horizontal AI lawThe AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is in force and phasing in: prohibitions applied from 2 February 2025, general-purpose AI obligations from 2 August 2025, and Commission enforcement powers over GPAI providers from 2 August 2026. A simplification omnibus agreed in May 2026 delays most high-risk obligations to December 2027 and August 2028, but the horizontal framework stands.Source →
United StatesSectoral + executive ordersNo horizontal federal AI statute as of August 2026; the administration steers policy through sectoral regulators and executive orders, including Executive Order 14365 of 11 December 2025 seeking a minimally burdensome national framework and directing a Justice Department AI Litigation Task Force to challenge state AI laws. Federal preemption remains only a June 2026 bipartisan discussion draft, and states continue to legislate in parallel.Source →
ChinaBinding vertical rulesNo single AI law yet (a comprehensive statute is in drafting under the State Council's 2026 legislative plan), but binding service-specific rules are enforced, led by the Interim Measures for Generative AI Services (in force August 2023). The Measures for Labelling AI-Generated Content and the mandatory national labelling standard GB 45438-2025 took effect on 1 September 2025.Source →
United KingdomPrinciples-based, no horizontal statuteExisting regulators apply five cross-sector principles to AI within their remits; no general AI statute is in force as of August 2026. The government's October 2025 AI Growth Lab proposal favours supervised regulatory sandboxes over a horizontal law, and Lord Holmes's Private Member's AI (Regulation) Bill has cleared all Lords stages and sits at Commons first reading without government backing.Source →
GCCBinding data protection, soft-law AIFive of the six GCC states have comprehensive data protection statutes (Kuwait still relies on sectoral rules), and no GCC jurisdiction has a binding general AI law; national AI strategies and ethics guidance remain voluntary. The region's first binding AI-specific rule is DIFC Regulation 10 (in force 1 September 2023), governing personal data processed through autonomous and semi-autonomous systems in Dubai's financial free zone.Source →
9 · At a Glance
StateData protectionTransfer & localisationAI strategy & guidanceFree zones & special jurisdictions
Saudi ArabiaPDPL in force (Sep 2023), enforced since Sep 2024Transfer Regulation in force (2023, amended Sep 2024)No binding AI law; SDAIA soft law + draft Global AI Hub Law (2025)No separate-law zones; 4 SEZs (2023) incl. Cloud Computing SEZ
United Arab EmiratesPDPL (Federal Decree-Law 45/2021) in force (2022), regulations pendingPDPL Arts 22-23 dormant; sectoral localisation in forceNo AI law; Charter (2024) soft law; federal AI authority (2026)DIFC DP Law 5/2020 + Reg 10 (2023); ADGM DPR 2021
QatarPDPPL (Law No. 13 of 2016) in forceNo general localisation; permissive PDPPL transfer ruleNational AI Strategy 2019 + guidance; no AI lawQFC Data Protection Regulations 2021 in force (2022)
KuwaitNo standalone law; CITRA DPPR (Decision 26/2024) in forceTiered localisation repealed (2024); disclosure duties remainNo AI law; draft National AI Strategy 2025-2028None with distinct data or AI rules
BahrainPDPL Law 30/2018, in force 2019Adequacy whitelist (Resolution 42/2022); no general localisationNational AI Policy 2025 (government sector); no AI law enactedNo separate-jurisdiction zones; Cloud Law 56/2018 data embassies
OmanPDPL (RD 6/2022) in force since Feb 2023; fully enforced Feb 2026Consent-plus-adequacy transfer regime (MD 34/2024); no general localisation lawNational AI policy (2025) and programme; no binding AI lawUnified zones law (RD 38/2025); AI Special Zone (RD 50/2026); no separate data regime

Status as of August 2026 · Every cell sourced to primary law below · Tap a state for detail

Cite this tracker

Complex AI Institute, The GCC AI Regulatory Tracker, August 2026 edition. Available at complexai.org/gcc-ai-tracker. Statuses reflect law and guidance in force or in draft as of 1 September 2026; each entry links to the primary source it rests on. Corrections: engage@complexai.org.